Tundra Kruleboyz 2024

Stormcast Eternal Army 2022

 

  

 

Necron Horde of 2021

 

 

How I Develop an Army Scheme - Case Study

Hello again friends,

Here’s a little insight into how I decide on what army to build next. After finishing my initial Kharadron force I’d been thinking about what vanguard-sized army to build next. I wanted to make a significant change from the satisfying-yet-slow approach of the extensive hand-painting I’d done on the sky dwarves.

My roommate and I moved recently into a lovely new flat that has allowed me to set up my first ever dedicated hobby table. Having all of my materials ready and available instead of needing to constantly set it them up and tear them down has been a huge boost for me in staying engaged with the hobby. This is particularly noticeable with the airbrush, which required a large amount of a setup previously that involve laying a canvas painting sheet over our kitchen table when no-one else was home.

So, I knew I wanted to make extensive use of the airbrush. I began looking online for techniques and tips and fell completely under the spell of Marco Frisoni. His youtube channel is superb, he’s a brilliant painter, and he’s got a great joyful vibe. I definitely recommend you check it out.

I particularly enjoyed his videos on:

• Blanchitsu Oil Washing
• Airbrush preshading and zenithal use
• Airbrushing with Inks to add color tones

Note that these videos are not exclusively about the above techniques, but provide strong examples of them that inspired me. I knew I wanted to try out some combination of these techniques so I dug out my old oil paints, and bought some inks to start experimenting with.

I felt that these techniques would work really well on models that have a lot of robes and metals on them. Robes in particular have always been a huge weakness of mine, as I’ve struggled in the past to know where to put highlights and how to push contrasts on large expanses of cloth. I settled on either Lumineth Realmlords or Sacrosanct Chamber Stormcast Eternals to experiment on, and got a box of each.

Before getting into the test models properly I slapped together some easy-to-build space marines I had lying around to see how the inks and my contrast paints would work through the airbrush, as well as how they’d interact with oil. It was very illuminating. Another thing to note is that for both the schemes below there were an additional 1-2 test models where I tried slight variations of the same thing, and the Stormcast I actually stripped before repainting them in a similar scheme to get what I wanted.

While it is a little exhausting, it is quite an organic experience to try out different things and make subtle alterations to how you approach different figures. It's quite satisfying to develop a strategy for an army-size project like this, especially when you’re pushing yourself and using new techniques. It saves you a huge amount of headache in the long run and means you can zero in on what you want and get a consistent looking force. One final note, make sure you write down every detail of your process so once you get the final result you haven't forget anything!

Here is what I came up with for the Lumineth and Stormcast test models:

This Lumineth scheme has a blue done with airbrush zenithal highlights using inks, and then I used a very heavy oil washing to make them grimy and grimdark. I really liked the idea of the typically-fancy looking Lumineth getting grimy and dirty, but I can’t say I loved the need to keep the colors bright silver and blue in order to show off the oil wash. I also didn’t really like the idea of having to do a really dirty or muddy base to give it visual continuity, messy bases don't really appeal to me.

This was my approach with the Stormcast, I didn’t use oils here but made extensive use of the airbrush where I did an initial zenithal highlight with a warm ivory tone, then sprayed a green contrast paint through the airbrush on the main robes which acted as a filter and kept the zenithal highlights underneath. After that I painted the armor by hand before airbrush shading everything with washes or inks from the bottom using sepia and earth tones. There were some final brushed highlights on the top portions of the robes/metals.

I really loved how all of this airbrush work accentuated the cloaks. It was the first time I’d felt like I’d done cloth justice, and had actually made a model look more 3D with my painting.

I also enjoyed the warm tones of the green/gold/brown color scheme and immediately had some strong thematic ideas in my head about where to go with it. The monk-like appearance of the Sacrosanct chamber led me to start thinking about flagstone bases that closely resembled the ones from these easy-to-build test models.

The finished test models.
Note that the white balance in this picture is off, and they are less yellowy than this.

I ended up finishing the models. and while I’ll likely tweak a bit of the shading to make it less heavy, this is pretty much exactly how I want them to look.

For the bases I’ve decided to try out Green Stuff World’s textured rolling pins with some sculpting material from a local arts store and so far, I’m very impressed. I'm planning on having them look like they're part of a monastery of some kind.

Given how much I liked the scheme, and the strong thematic impression that came out of it, I’ve decided to continue with the Stormcast army rather than the Lumineth. I’m looking forward to giving you more updates as they come together.

Thanks for reading!

Kharadron Overlords Update - February 2021

Hello Friends,

My hobby has continued to thrive during the COVID-19 pandemic as I’ve had lots of extra time to work on various projects. The most prominent of these since my last update has been the completion of a solid Vanguard-sized force of Kharadron Overlords.

I continued the approach that I took with the test models, and all of the infantry models were done with an old-school handpainting and layering approach. No contrast paints or airbrushing to be found! I also really enjoyed the cohesiveness of the neutral palette I’d selected.

However, when it came time to do the boats I decided to make use of the airbrush because I’m not a total masochist, and I also found the need to add one more colour to the palette to employ on the huge swathes of their hulls. I went with a dark turquoise based on Citadel’s ‘Incubi Darkness’ that I think works really well and ties into the sea-theme of the bases.

The beach bases were a lot of fun to do and help to make the army quite distinct. I used Vallejo water textures and exactly followed the excellent guide on water bases by Tsukuru_Paints that can be found on their Instagram here.

My personal favourite of the water bases.

I continue to really enjoy cracking out these small 1000 armies. It is particularly satisfying with the Age of Sigmar range, as something about the brilliant level of variety between the AoS sculpts and the flexibility of their potential color/basing schemes is super satisfying to me. A Vanguard force is also a manageable number of models that seems to be around the perfect amount for me to paint before I’m ready to move on to something else. I get to focus new techniques, styles, or material, and after a few test models get to see how they play out on an army-level scale across a variety of models.

A frothy boy!

There’s been lots more going on with my hobby lately, with many more exciting posts to come! Thanks for looking!

-Tom

Imperial Fists - Captain/Tor Garadon

Hey all!

This Imperial Fist Captain is a light conversion of Tor Garadon. I just swapped out the head so I didn't have to deal with big-chin McGee.

I have to say, I was really blown away with Garadon's model, it's such a dynamic and exciting pose while still having so much bulk and heft to it and feeling rock solid.

Additionally, the assembly is amazing. 95% of the cape is one piece and was able to be painted separately, along with the backpack as well, so it let me make the most of the blends on the cape and get at all the detailing on each piece. Went together like a dream after all that as well.

He feels like a perfect balance between the older more modular approach to 40k sculpts where you'd get distinct arms/legs, etc. and the newer CAD sculpts. It reminded me why GW is still at the absolute pinnacle of miniature sculpting and I can understand why I've seen so many conversions of it now!

April 2020 - Imperial Fists, the Triumphant Return

We are back! The world may be gripped  in the throes of a pandemic, and the last proper post on this blog may have been in July 2018, but the hobby has come storming back into my life with a vengeance and I felt it was time for a glorious exhumation of this blog.

I want to start with the fruits of my hobby labour over the last eight months. In late-fall I began to feel the familiar itch to start a new project and went looking for a fun technique to employ for inspiration. I settled on a Primaris-only Imperial Fists army for a few reasons:

1. Lends itself to a small-scale army with few figures
2. A simple but excellent recipe for vibrant yellow (link here)
3. The Primaris figures are lovely

The yellow recipe comes from Chapter Master Valrak, the internet's greatest Imperial Fist proponent. I substituted his use of Lamenter's Yellow as a glaze (now out of production) with a mix of vallejo yellow ink and vallejo glaze medium. Worked a charm!

I cut my teeth on an initial ten marines and a captain in gravis armor in the fall of last year. Once Covid-19 hit I had a lot more time on my hands so I threw myself back into the army and churned out a unit of aggressors, a repulsor executioner, and a librarian. Here's what we've got so far:

Group shot without librarian

Aggressors unit.

Repulsor Executioner with liberal oil wash for weathering.

Repulsor bum.

Primaris Librarian, probably my best painted figure yet.

The cloak is done with multiple shading glazes and vallejo weathering pigment for the dark staining.

The remaining minis on the painting block for this army include:

• Primaris Lieutenant
• Five man intercessor squad
• Tor Garadon

Once these are done i'll have a 1000 point battleline force to play around with. Tor Garadon is going to replace the gravis captain, whose paintjob I don't love. I'll make a new post for the army in all it's glory once it's complete.

Many many thanks to any returning readers, and I look forward to once again contributing to this blog. I hope you are keeping well and staying safe!

Are miniature wargaming sculpts sexist?: Part 1

If you're a fellow miniature gamer who is angered by the question posed in the title of this post, then try to take a deep breath. This is a very long and very detailed article that I have spent a lot of time on. I work to explain my conclusions in the manner I have been taught as an academic. Furthermore, you might be surprised at some of them, as I think I've been very forgiving and understanding towards the hobby that I love.

For the more progressive among you who would like to see a (perhaps deserved) feminist takedown of the miniature hobby, I'm afraid I'll probably disappoint you as well. As passionately as I feel about the representation of women in gaming, and as much is it frustrates me sometimes, the purpose of this piece is to speak to players in a way that encourages them to engage with a critical assessment about that representation. To that end I'll be building off of some really basic premises, and this will probably seem like baby steps to someone versed in feminist theory. But it is still a starting point!

Introduction: Why should we care how miniatures depict women?

I'd like to begin by putting out a statement that should be incredibly obvious to anyone who plays miniature wargames, regardless of their gender or how they feel about modern cultural critique. Here it is:

Not a lot of women play miniature wargames.

Forgive me if this seems like a trite statement, but it is an important basis for what I'm trying to explain with this piece. Everything I have seen as a hobbyist for the last ten years has indicated that this is pretty much an absolute truth across every miniatures system. Some lucky people may have miniature-gaming groups composed of something approaching a 50/50 gender split or higher, but for the vast majority of gamers in both casual and tournament settings this is not the reality. Women just do not participate in wargaming in the same numbers that men do.

There are a lot of possible reasons for this. Wargaming is one of those hobbies that is nestled in a matrix of circumstances that can make it difficult for people outside of its typical demographic to access. Sure, a woman can technically walk into a store, get a demo game, and buy a starter box as easily as the next person. Yet on the basis of women's representation in miniature gaming there is clearly something that is stopping them from doing so, and it must be more than just the time/money/skill commitment of the hobby because those are the same challenges that all miniature gamers face.

To that end I would like to propose two primary barriers to entry in the hobby that I think women face which men do not, and I'd like to dedicate this article to examining one of them.*

1. Player behavior. This is how women are treated by the players and employees that surround the miniature wargaming hobby. This is a big topic, and if I'm being honest is probably the one that is a more serious barrier to entry and more deserving of a full-length essay. But its also a lot more contentious and very difficult to really engage people about online. Additionally I don't feel comfortable speaking about a female experience that I haven't had myself. However I'd encourage gamers to think critically about their behavior as men towards women, and would point you to this superb piece by industry veteran Ken Burnside as a guide for what we, as men, can do to support women within our hobby communities. To hear how harsh the conditions faced by women in wargaming can be, I would direct you to Emily Garland's article, which spawned Burnside's piece.
2. The representation of women within miniature games. That is to say, how women are depicted both the fictional setting of a game (fluff) and within the models themselves. This is what I'm going to focus on here, as it's something I can quantify, and support with visual proof. It's a lot less subjective than player behavior, but at the same time is clearly an essential component of getting women engaged in the hobby.

This issue of representation is larger than just trying to engage women gamers as well. A poor representation of women will hold back any community around any product, hobby, or activity, from being respected and appealing to people in general. It is important one takes a critical approach to the products we buy, and the commercial artists and game-designers who make them, because they are a direct reflection on you as the consumer and your community.

I'm sure some of us have experienced a social stigma around wargaming, and this is certainly one of the reasons that stigma exists. This is not to say we should make all of our decisions in consideration of the opinions of others, as plenty of that stigma is not the fault of miniature wargamers. However a poor representation of 50% of the human race is not something that we, as gamers, should be proud about, nor is it something we should seek to uphold or defend. Being a male-oriented space should not be a cornerstone of our hobby's identity. The reality is that by orienting miniature gaming around men we (however unwittingly) make it difficult for women to enter and enjoy their time in our community, and we make it easy for non-gamers to dismiss or hold negative opinions about our hobby.

We should always be critical and self-aware about the things we choose to spend our time with, even if it’s something we see as mindless or harmless entertainment. Putting some thought into how your favourite film/game/book depicts women is useful not only as a consumer but on a personal level, it is an exercise in self-awareness and empathy.

I know that miniature gaming has the potential to be enjoyed by anyone regardless of age, race, or gender. There are a lot of different ways people can get value and satisfaction out of either its hobby and/or gaming aspects. I'd like to see this hobby take the same leaps and bounds in popularity that other aspects of underground/geek culture have in the last decade. I want to believe the community is ready for this.

*Note: there are plenty of lesser barriers to entry that I won't deal with here such as game-design that only employs miniatures for combat-oriented games, the level of cleanliness/safety of the average local game store relative to other social venues, etc. As much as these might be factors, they are also things that have a lot of individual variance and can be overcome and improved fairly easily.

Setup

To generate some food for thought about the representation of women within miniature gaming, I have gone through and rated how sexist or respectful the depictions of women are within sculpts for some of the most popular miniatures systems. I have rated each out of ten, with a higher number representing a generally more respectful depiction, while a lower number represents a generally more sexist one.

In order to assist me with reviewing each miniature range I'll be enlisting the help of my longtime partner. She is a fellow academic pursuing studies of feminism, gender, and sexuality at a doctoral level and is thus ideally situated to bolster the legitimacy of the assessments we make here. She is not a miniature gamer, but I feel this strengthens rather than undermines our mutual assessment, as it helps indicate an outsider perspective. It serves to answer the question of how people, and women in particular, might feel seeing some of these miniatures.

Obviously these ratings are a matter of opinion, but given our differing backgrounds and level of involvement in the hobby I feel it is a very informed one. Our different contexts, the range of ratings we have distributed, and the level of explanation provided all suggest that these not assessments that are easily dismissed as unfounded. My intention here is to try and help elevate miniature gaming with some critical thinking, not denigrate it. 

Exemptions: I am exempting historical miniatures wargames because they largely do not include women, and have something like an excuse for doing so. Furthermore their community remains somewhat separate from non-historical miniature wargaming. I'm talking specifically about games in which the creators entirely define the world they create, and thus can and should be examined on their portrayal of women. I'm also not dealing with miniature interpretations of already-established franchises such as the Batman Miniatures Game, where the sculptors and design team of the miniatures system don't have a lot of leeway in terms of how women are presented.

Methodology

• I went through each range and saved an official image for every figure that portrays a female character to make something like a "gallery" for each. I also made a note any time the range depicted characters of color, at least according to fluff/official paint scheme.
• My partner and I sat down and, over the course of several hours, went through the contents of each gallery discussing the figures and taking notes in order to create an overall rating for how respectful or sexist its depictions of women are, as well as select what we felt to be the "best" and "worst" figures of each range in terms of those metrics.

Before we started this assessment I emphasized the following in order to give a bit of context:

• Every figure we explore is supposed to be in a combat, or combat-like, environment.
• All of these games lean towards pulpy genre fiction and pure escapism, and consequently need to be approached as an entertainment medium. As much as it does not excuse them from sexist portrayals of women, these figures are also not attempting to be serious representations of real-life women.
• There are limitations on the level of detail/variety possible for sculptors at the 28mm range. When trying to indicate a character is a female it can be difficult to make it clear without exaggerated proportions. This is especially true if there is a lot of armor involved. Again, this does not excuse when these exaggerations are problematic ("boob armor" is endemic), but they can be done well and also done poorly.

Our conclusions are presented here as a synthesis of views between a dedicated miniature hobbyist and a feminist academic, with no distinction between who said what. We discussed everything until we agreed on the overall score of each range.

When attempting to determine whether a miniature was a respectful or reasonable representation of women we looked at the following:

1. What is her clothing and/or armor like? Does it make sense for what she is supposed to be doing?

2. How is she posed? Does it look like she is in, or ready, for combat?

3. What is the fluff for the model? Is there a reason provided for why she might be dressed a certain way? This did not come up every time, but I did raise it when I felt the fluff might be a significant factor in deciding how we felt about a miniature.

These lines of inquiry are based off of similar criticisms of female representation being discussed within other forms of entertainment and game-environment. The most obvious of these is the videogames industry, and we would refer you to Feminist Frequency's discussions of female videogame body language and female armor if you want some further explanation for why these depictions are significant.

Infinity

This is one of the most important ranges we evaluated, as it's not only a company that has been critically lauded for the quality of its sculpts but is also the only game system listed here whose figures presume to relate to something like modern individuals and modern cultures. Given this context we elected to spend more time on this by splitting the female models into their respective faction and assign a score and best/worst mini for each one.

Aleph 5/10

Despite the cool Ghost in the Shell fluff, there is a rampant amount of highly sexualized “shoot from the hip” silly poses, and focus on female body parts. The reason Major Katsuagi is a more compelling character in the GITS film (over her heavily sexualized TV incarnation) is her muted expressions and struggle with self-identity acting as a foil to her sexualized body. That doesn’t come across here at all; instead we have cyborg women that apparently really want you to know how sexy they are. This is underscored by the contrast between the sexualized female post-humans with the bulky “hoo-rah!” machismo of the male Myrmidons.

Best: Myrmidon Officer

The female myrmidon looks badass and combat ready so she is, unsurprisingly, Aleph's best female sculpt. Unfortunately she is also the only woman in the otherwise exclusively-male Myrmidon range that encompass the "door-kicking and ass-whooping" aspect of the faction, whereas most of the women are part of the "infiltrating society as sexy cyborg babes" portion.

Worst: Asure w/spitfire

Pretty much any of the Asura/Posthuman figures could go here. They're all powerful cyborgs that chose to fight on the battlefield as naked women for.... no good reason. In contrast most of the male cyborgs like Achilles and Ajax get slabs of plate armor. Note the gun is impractically positioned on her hips so we get a better view of her breasts.

Ariadna 4/10

The fluff would have you believe Ariadna women would be badass ladies in present-day combat attire who are still tough enough to take out their high-tech opponents, but the models are deeply underwhelming in this regard.

Best: Uxia McNeil

Uxia looks practically dressed and combat ready for some stealthy infiltration. Also a special mention to the females in the Wulvers unit, who represent probably the only women sculpts with prominent muscles in the Infinity range.

Worst: Caledonian Volunteers

That we are to presume these two figures represent the same type of combatant on the tabletop is absurd. Everything about the female figure connotes a prioritization of displaying sexuality over her supposed role as a combatant. There is the "shoot from the hip" arched-back pinup pose and the extreme amount of skin on display, but of particular note is the clothing: the kilt of the male figure, something that connotes the Scottish heritage of the figures' fluff, gets morphed into a tiny schoolgirl skirt that is so short it reveals a flash of panties, completely undermining not just the assumption she is in combat, but also the figure's background fluff , in favor of flaunting its sexuality. Corvus Belli should be legitimately ashamed of ever having put out this figure set.

Haqqislam 8/10

Great fluff about a second golden age of Islam that adds some real diversity to the Infinity world. For the most part women are well armored with the same uniform as their male counterparts. The figures are somewhat whitewashed in their official paintjobs, and we haven’t seen anything resembling a Hijab or Niqab, but overall it’s certainly a high watermark for the infinity range and the depiction of women in tabletop gaming in general.

Best: Naffatun

Great stuff here, a 50/50 split between male and female squad members and a practical gender-neutral uniform that is the same for each. Not sure about the lack of helmet on the one female figure but overall this is great.

Worst: Nazarova sisters

Rule of thumb: If you are wearing less clothes on a battlefield than the "combat geishas" (Odalisques) you should probably wear more clothes. Thankfully this level of sexist absurdity isn't present anywhere else in the Haqqislam range, but boy howdy what an outlier.

Nomads 5/10

It was somewhat surprising that the nomads ended up getting rated so highly, but we liked the non-standard beauty norms being portrayed, even if they were gratuitous sometimes. The fluff of them being cyberpunk-style renegades also helps contextualize things a bit.

Best: Reverend Custodier

Very cool figure here. Great dynamic pose and well-armoured while using body proportions that aren't bums or boobs to convey femininity.

Worst: Reverend Moira

One might be able to look past the "pointy bra" aesthetic with her chest armor, but I think we can all agree that wearing just a thong in a combat situation is absurd. Also note the passivity of the female figure here, as the sculpt design makes it look as if a gust of wind is blowing aside her trench coat rather than having her bum being something she's clearly displaying herself. The suggestion that her outfit would otherwise cover her a lot more if it weren't for this "gust of wind" makes the audience for this figure seem really voyeuristic, and adds an additional problematic layer to the figure.

Panoceania 9/10

Some really solid female minis here, with a lot of the armor being really practical and only a few poses providing any real issue. A great range for depicting women.

Best: Jeanne D’Arc in Mobility Armor

What a fantastic model! The proportions are designed so that it would still look like a woman even without the flowing hair, but there are no buttcheeks or breasts in sight. Instead you get a terrifyingly angry combatant hurling herself at the enemy! 

Worst: Fusiliers

Note the difference in posing between the male/female fusiliers who are at rest. One is a battle-weary veteran and the other looks like she's checking out how big her breasts are in a mirror.

Yu Jing 7/10

Again, it’s nice to see some racial diversity that doesn’t feel really stereotyped or problematic. Some really solid female figures in this range brought down by one or two egregious instances.

Best: Keisotsu Butai

A gender-neutral uniform that's still very dynamic. The female model is still clearly female via her arm proportions. No bubble-butt or heaving bosoms needed.

Worst: Asuka Kisaragi

Once again, the double standard on display here is absurd. We have a male figure in which there is litterally no skin on display whatsoever, with a pose that connotes he is actively engaged in combat. The female figure on the other hand, ostensibly the same type of unit, has extremely prominent cleavage, no helmet in order to show off her face and long hair, and is posed in such a way that she is clearly not actively engaged in battle. Note that rather than being hunched over her motorcyle like her cohort, which might obstruct our view of her cleavage, she is instead standing upright and thrusting out her chest at the viewer.

Infinity Conclusions & Thoughts

Infinity is difficult to pin down as it’s a miniatures range that contains a lot of extremes. Corvus Belli unquestionably produces some of the best depictions of women out there, but also some of the worst (at least among the most prominent games and companies that we're looking at here). While there is a strong female presence it is problematized by frequent usage of pin-up aesthetics. It appears CB wants to ensure there are token babes for every faction, and judging by the sexist absurdity that is their “Bootleg” range this seems to be something the company considers a core aspect of its identity.

That they clearly know how to produce positive female depictions makes the decision to have “sexy babes” a keystone of the infinity aesthetic all the more disappointing. The level of sexualisation on display in Infinity, like those of the other systems we examine here, does not appear to serve any purpose beyond a desire to appeal to a presumed straight-male consumer.That the game itself doesn’t have anything even remotely resembling sex or intimacy means deciding to make it “sexy” is less about a passion for the game and hobby and more a decision from a marketing/design team to maximize profits. It's one thing to portray strong and healthy individuals as military combatants, but CB deliberately oversteps the line of what might feasibly be considered "practical" to sex things up. This is not an attitude anyone should be particularly happy to see within the community, and CorvusBelli has already come under fire for its sexist portrayals of women. 

Corvus Belli is highly indicative of the miniature gaming industry in that it makes the assumption that its system will be played primarily by men. As much as this might be true, they make the further assumption that the best way to appeal to the desires of this male demographic is through the over-sexualization of many women figures. In doing so, they only serve to reinforce a feedback loop that miniature gaming is something for men, and men alone. We consider this pandering not only actively discouraging to potential female gamers but also insulting to the male consumer, as it implies that most straight men would only enjoy their miniatures or systems if they are constantly presented with heavily sexualized female figures. We do not believe that Infinity would be less successful if it were to have less sexualization, nor do we believe that male consumers cannot appreciate games containing female characters unless those female characters are sexually displayed.

A frequent excuse I’ve heard about CB’s style when it’s criticized is that it’s drawing from anime and therefore has a very specific aesthetic it’s aiming for. This is actually great, and has helped make the system really unique and produced some superb artwork/sculpts. However it doesn’t act as an excuse for the extent of the sexualisation within the system. As someone who is a big anime fan, you’ll notice that most of its critically lauded works tend to be the ones that downplay, satirize, or outright ignore the fan service tropes. Ex: Studio Ghibli, Samurai Champloo, GITS, Full Metal Alchemist, Psycho-Pass, etc. If Infinity’s frequent sexualisation is a result of its anime influence then its creators consciously elected to borrow from one of the worst aspects of the anime medium, an attitude to portraying women that continues to hold anime back from being a more respected and widely-regarded medium. This seems like a lazy excuse to not challenge yourself by pointing to the foibles of another industry.

To return to the miniatures themselves, one of the ways this anime-influence comes up in Infinity is the homogenous nature of its bodies, with little variation in the respective proportions of male and female figures. There is a slightly more variance in the male range, with some models being quite skinny while others are more muscular, but for the most part every guy is toned and relatively beefy. Whereas for the women this manifests as very thin waist/arms/legs with large breasts and often long hair. There is zero attempt within the Infinity range to portray anything outside of this female body configuration, and it seems like each female character could easily fit into the armor (or lack thereof) of any other female character. Even setting aside issues of sexualisation, this lack of diversity makes the female characters feel interchangeable. 

Some players make a fluff-based excuse that the Infinity universe has such advanced biometric technology that people can look like whatever they want, and therefore decide to be sexy. The obvious response here is: "A sexy lady would still wants armor/clothing in a fight and wouldn't be in a silly pose for no reason". We would also counter this by suggesting that a world in which every woman in the Infinity-universe wants a Barbie body is a dumb idea. Anyone who attempts to justify every female miniature having huge breasts, long hair, and skimpy clothes by pointing to the fluff is undermining the setting in order to justify what is clearly just a callus design decision. These ubiquitous barbie-doll bodies are especially problematic given that even mainstream media is starting to diversify what it labels "sexy" across different ages and body types. You'd think that Corvus Belli, both as fluff-writers and as a company, could include at least some muscular women as part of Infinity's elite spec-op teams.

This has perhaps focused too much on Corvus Belli’s flaws in their portrayals of women, and we want to emphasize that they get it right as often if not more than they get it wrong. Everything I have criticized CB for above applies to the miniature-gaming industry as a whole, many of whom present far more problematic figures. Furthermore there is nothing inherently unsavory about a woman character expressing her sexuality. Rather what matters is the context, and this is especially true of miniature wargaming in which we have objects depicting women characters that are designed and sold within a male-oriented industry. Within the miniature gaming environment we see nothing except a character's appearance, and therefore the sexualization of women figures cannot serve any purpose beyond titillating a presumed straight-male audience. We did ultimately reached the conclusion that sexualisation of female Infinity figures is overwrought, with a lot of it being there for very little reason. Thankfully it’s balanced by some really solid depictions of female combatants, but there is still a lot of room for improvement.

Special note: Some serious bonus points to Infinity for a relatively strong inclusion of racial individuals. To my knowledge there are no other non-historical games that include such an extensive portrayal of characters of color, and certainly nothing with the level of respect CB shows.

Warhammer 40k 7/10

This result may seem surprising given the almost-total absence of women within the 40k setting. However those few women who GW does depict on the tabletop are actually pretty good in comparison to many other systems. So 40k ended up scoring highly on its figures. A few interesting and salient points came up while we were discussing these:

Firstly, the facial expression on female figures has a very real effect on how one interprets the rest of their body. A figure that is shouting, angry, and generally looks like she’s taking part in a battle has a somewhat mitigating effect on whatever sexuality they're depicting. A prime example of this is the dark elf succubus, who looks genuinely scary despite her somewhat revealing clothing.

Such an appearance helps to imply the figure is in a the battlefield environment and not (exclusively) on display for a presumably male viewer. Note that for this to work it does need to be accompanied by a suitably combat-ready pose. As much as facial expressions might only be an implication, and does not excuse problematic clothing, it is something we noticed.

Secondly, we reached the conclusion that when it comes to depictions of women, quality outweighs quantity. Namely, it’s a lot better for a range to present relatively few female figures, but have them be positive and respectful representations, rather than have a large presence of heavily sexualized women. With that said, given the totally fictional nature of these settings/figures there is no reason we, as the consumer, cannot expect both quality and quantity representation of women from miniature gaming companies. We're just saying that if we're forced to choose, we would prefer the former. This is one of the primary reasons that Geedubs scored highly here, the women figures in the 40k range are generally not too bad relative to other systems even though there are far less of them.

Special Note: Despite the figures scoring well, the near-total absence of women within the fluff of Games Workshop, and the poor portrayal of them when they do come up, is so notorious that it has become a target of popular satire. As much as quality might outweigh quantity, this does not excuse the conscious neglect of women by a games company. A potential female gamer has almost no options for fielding female units using Games Workshop sculpts, and no options whatsoever in which the fluff behind those tabletop figures is anywhere near as empowering as the endless glorification of the space marine male. It would be a great boon to the hobby and Games Workshop’s image as the premier miniature-gaming company if they were not only to introduce more means to field female characters on the tabletop, but make those women as powerful and dangerous as their male cohorts within the setting.

Best: Commander Shadowsun

An all-time favourite female sculpt. Why? Because it underscores her gender is totally irrelevant on the battlefield. She's got a great backstory and you know it's a woman, but when you look at the model all you see is a badass engine of stealthy destruction.

Worst: Sisters Repentia

Hoooboy, aren't these a sight. Nothing suggests an empowered and battle-ready woman more than bondage gear and handkerchiefs for clothing. Thankfully GW hasn't portrayed anything this egregious in over a decade, and these are from the outdated Sisters of Battle range. Unfortunately some of these old sculpts are still available on their website, even if they are now very much exceptions to the norm. Looking at these really underscores how far we've come as a community, and how far we still have to go...

Warhammer Fantasy/Age of Sigmar – 6/10

Again, a score that’s somewhat higher than might be expected, for similar reasons to what has been outlined in the 40k rating. There is a prevalence of angry faces that helps to mitigate the more sexualized models such as the wych elves. A few other points that came up here:

The “angelic” aura around some of the Brettonian and Elf women can be just as problematic as having a bunch of needless skin on display. While the fluff obviously accounts for why the lady of the lake would show up to battle in a dress, the lack of other female figures across the range makes this “battlefield dress" stand out like a sore thumb. 

If your sculpt sits side-saddle in a silk dress on a unicorn then there is a slight possibility it's a woman.

There is something like a Madonna/Whore complex across the Fantasy range, in which women are either enchantresses wearing dresses or scantily clad demon witches screaming for blood, with very little in-between.

An interesting point that came up was the sexualisation of non-human women, which we felt is generally less problematic than women who are presented as strictly human. The implication that what you’re looking at is an entirely fantastical representation does provide an extra layer of suspended belief that occasionally might make a sexualized figure more acceptable. This is hardly an absolute rule, as all of these figures (especially elves) are clearly invoking the human form, but there is a real distinction to be made in the mind of the consumer between the sexualized portrayals of “Morathi, Queen of Naggaroth” versus "Megan, from San Francisco”.

There is a total lack of non-white characters within the WHFB range, with very little by way of female representations. Currently we haven't seen female figures of any kind released for Age of Sigmar, which is definitely disappointing.

Best: Valkia the Bloody

There are some weird armour design choices here between the prominent breasts and "skirt". But that doesn't change the fact Valkia looks like a legitimately terrifying combatant.

Worst: Dark Elf Sorceress

The facial expression is pretty good here, as is the toned stomach and musculature. But however "non-human" you are, that is just not enough clothes to wear to a fight.

Malifaux 4/10

Malifaux fared the worst out of all of the systems we analyzed and for good reason. Despite the lovely quality of their plastic sculpts it seems like every woman, with a few comical exceptions (ex: Abuela) is deeply sexualized and woefully under-clothed. While we appreciate this is a game about magic and therefore power-armor is not going to show up, that doesn’t explain why nearly every woman is posing in really fetishistic-looking clothes.

Malifaux’s aesthetic and fluff suffer somewhat from wanting to draw on everything at once. It has western cowboys, steampunk robots, undead zombies, eastern samurai, nightmare demons, Victorian criminals, southern voodoo, etc. The result is a range that includes a lot of diversity but does so in a way that seems really tokenistic and appropriative. Nothing feels cohesive or well thought-out, and it’s a matter of slapping either a lacy Victorian dress or a kimono on a character that determines their backstory/personality/motivations. Consequently we felt the fluff of Malifaux fails to present any narrative justifications for this overt sexualisation and use of cultural signifiers outside of surface appearance and “cool” factor.

 

This cultural appropriation extends not only to the bodies of individual characters but also the materials of those cultures. Instead of full-length kimonos we get skimpy little skirts with Asian designs; instead of the unique imagery of the New Orleans Mardi Gras we get some feather boas and a slinky dress. The notion of Edward Said’s “Orientalism” came up when we were discussing this point. It’s as if the materials of these different cultures exist for the miniature designers to manipulate into a hollow echo of the original in order to make some “exotic” babes. 

There is an undercurrent of sexualized body-horror that seems to apply only to female undead/demon models. Body horror can be really effective and unsettling (Alien is one of our favourite films) but the double standard going on here between male and female undead/demonic figures really undercuts its legitimacy.

The “doppleganger” figure is actually a decent example of body horror, but in the context of a game that also presents you with the “rotten belles” and “nephalim” models, it feels less like it’s trying to be unsettling and more like an excuse to paint more breasts. While there are a few rotting undead men kicking around, none of them are naked or sexualized in a similar manner.

To whit: women in Malifaux are always on display. Whether they’re rotting corpses or not. Whatever “personality” they might have frequently stems from a problematic or token usage of different materials/clothing.

 

Special Note: “Toni Ironsides” (seen above) might be seen as an exception to this conclusion but we actually see her as one of the most severe examples of a tokenism. She is a black, street-fighting, anti-establishment ex-slave, who has cornrows and wears bandages on her face. As much as some of these facets might be legitimate expressions of Black American womanhood, beauty standards, or culture, the decision to consolidate all of these facets into a single character, with no comparable black characters within the range, reinforces the idea that this is a token representation of a black woman rather than a legitimate attempt to engage with the nuances of presenting a character of color within a given fictional setting. In this regard Toni Ironsides is no different from any of the other token cultural representations mentioned above.

Best: Rasputina

Rasputina is suitably chilly and intimidating looking, and one of the few decent female sculpts in the range.

Worst: Angelica

Angelica is a scantily clad black woman taking to the battlefield in a slinky dress with some shoutouts to the New Orleans Mardi Gras. She runs a stage show and is supposed be very intimidating but that's difficult to believe when she's posing in a way that ensures her dress barely covers her.

Bonus Worst: Lady Justice & Lilith

Just to reaffirm why Malifaux is our lowest rating, I present two of Malifaux's most powerful combat characters in the game, Each is the leader of her own faction. To be fair, this version of Lilith is based on her original appearance in 1st edition, and the current one has more clothes. Either way, this level of sexualization is pretty absurd.

Continued in part two, found here.